(01-10-2013, 07:04 PM)midnightblues Wrote:
And I guess we can all agree to disagree .Chicago is not really classified as a rock band is more of the soft rock adult contemporary bandwagon. The reason why I'm not so much like in Chicago has nothing to do with their musicianship or their ability or their skills with their instrument. It's just that I don't think that horns belong in a rock band if you want to classify it as a rock 'n roll.
peace out an love.
Yah but some might question the inclusion of the Beach Boys as not being a rock band either, and alot of their early hits are closer to
soft rock Chicago in tenor. Chicago has alot of true rock songs, like the one I posted earlier, "I'm a Man" is much closer to 'rock' than "In My Room"
or "Kokomo" is as "soft rock" as anything Peter Cetera did
I agree Cetera left rock for soft rock/ballad music, but that doesn't mean Chicago was not a rock band. They were definitely a rock band...at the beginning
and as far as horns not belonging in rock...
Bruce Springsteen and Clarence Clemons might disagree
Carlos Santana might disagree with you too
How can I forget the Beatles loved horns in their music
and no one on this planet will say the Beatles aren't a rock band